From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 23:37:21 ART
Hi Tony
I Think that the neighbor in the IPV6 Address Family should be an IPV6
Address..
Regards
Victor
-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de Tony
Paterra
Enviado el: Miircoles, 24 de Mayo de 2006 10:30 p.m.
Para: GroupStudy CCIE
Asunto: IPv6 BGP peering...
Working through the basics of routing protocols in IPv6 and noticed
something that seemed strange to me... When creating BGP peerings
between 2 routers (EBGP or IBGP, not important) I started out by
configuring it like this...
For brevity... Assume routes are being passed in the BGP table and
IPv6 address/unicast-routing is configured.
R1:
E0/0: 1.1.1.1
router bgp 1
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote 1
address-family ipv6
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote 1
neighbor 2.2.2.2 activate
R2:
E0/0: 2.2.2.2
router bgp 1
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote 1
address-family ipv6
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote 1
neighbor 1.1.1.1 activate
What I'm having trouble seeing is BGP routes being passed even though
these neighbor relationships come up under "sh bgp ipv6 unicast
summary". When I change the address-family ipv6 commands to peer
with IPv6 addresses instead of IPv4 I am seeing these routes appear
in the IPv6 BGP table. I can't find a really good explanation of
this. Is there some basic rule for running IPv6 BGP alongside IPv4
that I'm missing?
Tony Paterra
apaterra@gmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART