RE: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?

From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 12:48:52 ART


        Traffic shaping does not relate to bandwidth reservations. The
CIR or average rate of traffic shaping determines the rate at this
packets are moved from the shaping queue to the transmit ring of the
interface.

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Victor Cappuccio
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:16 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?
>
> Hello Guys
>
>
>
> Quick question here about using GTS and Frame-relay TShaping
>
>
>
> In GTS we can reserve the bandwidth from the default 75% using the
> max-reserved-bandwidth, is this same as in Frame-relay TShaping but
using
> frame-relay mincir?
>
>
>
> I thought that the frame-relay mincir would not have effect until I
> receive
> BECNS and then the router could throttle back to the mincir gradually.
>
>
>
> Example: look at Internetworks Experts Lab 16 Task 8.3
>
>
>
> A little bit confused about that
>
> Thanks
>
> Victor.
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART