Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?

From: Victor Cappuccio (cvictor@protokolgroup.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 12:15:37 ART

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Previous message: Larry Chuon: "fallback bridging"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello Guys

Quick question here about using GTS and Frame-relay TShaping

In GTS we can reserve the bandwidth from the default 75% using the
max-reserved-bandwidth, is this same as in Frame-relay TShaping but using
frame-relay mincir?

I thought that the frame-relay mincir would not have effect until I receive
BECNS and then the router could throttle back to the mincir gradually.

Example: look at Internetworks Experts Lab 16 Task 8.3

A little bit confused about that

Thanks

Victor.

• Next message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Previous message: Larry Chuon: "fallback bridging"
• Next in thread: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Victor Cappuccio: "RE: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Maybe reply: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Q: max-reserved-bandwidth vs frame-relay mincir?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART