Asymmetric routing can cause excessive flooding of unicast IP

From: WorkerBee (ciscobee@gmail.com)
Date: Wed May 24 2006 - 10:07:37 ART


Can anyone highlight me why "Asymmetric routing can cause excessive
flooding of unicast IP packets."?

I still cannot understand.

Asymmetric Routing
===============
Asymmetric routing occurs when packets are sent from a source to
destination over one path while return traffic follows a different
path. This will often be the case with GLBP, since traffic is
intentionally being shared over multiple upstream paths. Asymmetric
routing can cause excessive flooding of unicast IP packets. This
adverse condition results from the MAC address of downstream hosts
being aged out of the switch CAM (typical default time is 5 minutes).
The CAM aging time can be increased to a higher value to avoid this
condition. One suggestion for the Cisco Catalyst 6500 is to make the
CAM aging time equal to the ARP timeout for the MSFC. For example, set
the Layer 2 CAM entry aging time in distribution layer switches to the
same duration as the ARP timeout using the command:
set cam agingtime 1-1000 14400
This will set the time to 4 hours, same as default ARP cache timeout
for MSFC and will minimize any flooding of IP unicast traffic when
packets are never received for a given MAC.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART