Need clarifications

From: Larry Chuon (lchuon@gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 22 2006 - 14:58:06 ART

• Next message: Godswill Oletu: "Re: ip access-list vs. access-list"
• Previous message: Jai Prakash: "Re: ip access-list vs. access-list"
• Next in thread: Leigh Harrison: "Re: Need clarifications"
• Maybe reply: Leigh Harrison: "Re: Need clarifications"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group,

I've some question for the lab.

a. Is full reachability required to all backbones? For instance, I can see
BGP routes from the backbone, but I can't ping it. Only my edge route can
ping. Do I need to fix this either by redistributing BGP into IGP, static
ARP or implementing NAT?

b. If asked, make sure future changes don't impact the backbone, do they
mean something like:
  1) route summarization or
  2) ip rip trigger
  3) can you think of any other options?

c. In OSPF, is it best to have /24 on Loopback or just leave it if not
asked?

Thanks in advance.
Larry

• Next message: Godswill Oletu: "Re: ip access-list vs. access-list"
• Previous message: Jai Prakash: "Re: ip access-list vs. access-list"
• Next in thread: Leigh Harrison: "Re: Need clarifications"
• Maybe reply: Leigh Harrison: "Re: Need clarifications"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART