Filtering RFC 1918

From: Kashif Masood (kashifmasood27@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun May 21 2006 - 03:04:43 ART

• Next message: Godswill Oletu: "Re: Interface dampening question !!"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Peak to the Average?"
• Next in thread: Sidalo: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Sidalo: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Marvin Greenlee: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Kashif Masood: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Larry Chuon: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Team:

This may be a very basic question, but I am confused about which access-list
is right

We know that the private address range is 172.16.0.0 172.31.0.0 /12

So if we have to filter RFC 1918 addresses, which access-list is right

access-list 10 deny 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255

or

access-list 10 deny 172.16.0.0 0.31.255.255

Your input will be highly appreciated.

Thanks

• Next message: Godswill Oletu: "Re: Interface dampening question !!"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: Peak to the Average?"
• Next in thread: Sidalo: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Sidalo: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Marvin Greenlee: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Kashif Masood: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Larry Chuon: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: Filtering RFC 1918"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART