From: Radoslav Vasilev (deckland@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 20 2006 - 14:54:08 ART
Hi Group,
Must be the long study day...
All of you saying that the "vlan header" part requires ISL are correct!
Well known fact for all of us of course, and i shouldn't even call it a
"wording trap".
Thanks to all!
Rado
On 5/20/06, rocco ****** <roccor21@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rad,
>
> I think because the question indicates it's looking for a 'header' that
> ISL would be the only solution becasue it encapsulates the frame opposed to
> tagging it. Dot1q if i'm not mistaken only tags the frame and does not use
> encapusaltion. The difference between 26bytes and 4bytes.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: *"Radoslav Vasilev" <deckland@gmail.com>*
> Reply-To: *"Radoslav Vasilev" <deckland@gmail.com>*
> To: *"Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>*
> Subject: *only tagged frames over a trunk*
> Date: *Sat, 20 May 2006 17:22:08 +0100*
> MIME-Version: *1.0*
> Received: *from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
> bay0-mc7-f7.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat,
> 20 May 2006 09:22:21 -0700*
> Received: *(from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com (
> 8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id k4KGMJva002008;Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:19 -0400
> *
> Received: *from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
> lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
> k4KGM8qf001974for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 May 2006
> 12:22:08 -0400*
> Received: *from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
> groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
> k4KGMAxL019021GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10 -0400*
> Received: *(from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit)
> id k4KGMAcw019019for ccielabxhiddenx; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10 -0400*
> Received: *from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [
> 66.249.82.202]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
> k4KGMAjQ018999 GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10 -0400*
> Received: *by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i31so682789wxd for <
> ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 May 2006 09:22:08 -0700 (PDT)*
> Received: *by 10.70.11.20 with SMTP id 20mr3374830wxk; Sat, 20 May 2006
> 09:22:08 -0700 (PDT)*
> Received: *by 10.70.35.15 with HTTP; Sat, 20 May 2006 09:22:08 -0700
> (PDT)*
>
>
> >Hi Group,
> >
> >This one should be easy and still it got me thinking:
> >
> >The task is to create a trunk interface between two switches with the
> >requirement of "all the trafifc should be tagged with VLAN header".
> >
> >The solution from InternetworkExpert (lab 2, task 1.2) is ISL.
> >My question: could a dot1q trunk be a solution, if the addtional ``vlan
> >dot1q tag native`` command is used?
> >
> >According to the docs, the effect will be tagging on egress port and
> >dropping untagged native vlan frames on ingress port.
> >
> >What do you think?
> >
> >
> >Rado
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART