From: rocco ****** (roccor21@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat May 20 2006 - 13:32:29 ART
Rad,
I think because the question indicates it's looking for a 'header' that
ISL would be the only solution becasue it encapsulates the frame opposed
to tagging it. Dot1q if i'm not mistaken only tags the frame and does not
use encapusaltion. The difference between 26bytes and 4bytes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Radoslav Vasilev" <deckland@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "Radoslav Vasilev" <deckland@gmail.com>
To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: only tagged frames over a trunk
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 17:22:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.groupstudy.com ([207.44.210.9]) by
bay0-mc7-f7.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Sat, 20 May 2006 09:22:21 -0700
Received: (from sympa@localhost)by lists.groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) id k4KGMJva002008;Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:19
-0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (www.groupstudy.com [209.51.144.7])by
lists.groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
k4KGM8qf001974for <ccielab@lists.groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 May 2006
12:22:08 -0400
Received: from groupstudy.com (groupstudy.com [127.0.0.1])by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
k4KGMAxL019021GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10 -0400
Received: (from listserver@localhost)by groupstudy.com
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k4KGMAcw019019for
ccielabxhiddenx; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com
[66.249.82.202]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10) with
ESMTP id k4KGMAjQ018999 GroupStudy Mailer; Sat, 20 May 2006 12:22:10
-0400
Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i31so682789wxd for
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>; Sat, 20 May 2006 09:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.11.20 with SMTP id 20mr3374830wxk; Sat, 20 May
2006 09:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.35.15 with HTTP; Sat, 20 May 2006 09:22:08 -0700
(PDT)
>Hi Group,
>
>This one should be easy and still it got me thinking:
>
>The task is to create a trunk interface between two switches with
the
>requirement of "all the trafifc should be tagged with VLAN header".
>
>The solution from InternetworkExpert (lab 2, task 1.2) is ISL.
>My question: could a dot1q trunk be a solution, if the addtional
``vlan
>dot1q tag native`` command is used?
>
>According to the docs, the effect will be tagging on egress port and
>dropping untagged native vlan frames on ingress port.
>
>What do you think?
>
>
>Rado
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART