From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Fri May 19 2006 - 10:47:04 ART
Hi tony,
Thanks for your reply, it really cleared up my doubt. I just had a chat with
another fellow Petr on groupstudy and he is saying the same.
Have a good weekend.
Frog.
On 5/19/06, Tony Schaffran <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com> wrote:
>
> You can break it up into /28, /29, and /30 subnets, you just need to stay
> within your bit boundries.
>
> The best way to illustrate this is like this:
>
> First, create your /28's
>
> 192.168.0.0/28
> 192.168.0.16/28
> 192.168.0.32/28
> 192.168.0.48/28
> 192.168.0.64/28
> And so on.....
>
> Then you can take one of those /28's and break it up into smaller /29
> subnets.
>
> 192.168.0.0/29
> 192.168.0.8/29
>
> Then you can take on of the /29's you just created and break it down
> further.
>
> 192.168.0.0/30
> 192.168.0.4/30
>
> Another thing to keep in mind, is if you are going to use one of the
> smaller
> subnets, it voids the use of the larger subnet it was created from. For
> example, if you decide to deploy 192.168.0.4/30 then you cannot use the
> 192.168.0.0/28
>
> Did I clear anything up or just confuse things further?
>
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Network Analyst
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Radioactive Frog
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:16 AM
> To: alexeim@orcsoftware.com
> Cc: Jai Prakash; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Subneting - Basic Question but doubt full
>
>
> HI Alexei,
>
> I am within the subnet boundary. I am only talking about subneting the
> 192.168.1.0. my first subnet would be /30, second subnet would be /29
> third
> could be /28, remember its still under the /24 boundary. Why can't I
> subnet
> this IP block like this ?
>
> Frog!
> Jumping on the wall
>
>
>
> On 5/19/06, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim@orcsoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> > No, you cannot do like this.. since /30+/30=/29 you have to assign one
> > more /30 network after 192.168.1.0/30 to be able to change from /30 to
> > /29 , etc /29+/29=/28..
> > i.e. you cannot allocate smaller subnet from any place of /24 network,
> > you have to consider bit boundaries. in your example you cannot allocate
> > /27 subnet from 192.168.1.4...
> >
> > If I am not missing something here.... :-) pls do correct me otherwise
> >
> > A.
> >
> >
> >
> > on 19/05/2006 02:58 Radioactive Frog wrote:
> > > Hi Jaiprakash,
> > > thanks for answering to my query:
> > >
> > > Can't we subnet 192.168.1.0 to as below :
> > >
> > > a) first subnet 192.168.1.0/30 --> valid host 192.168.1.1 to
> > > 192.168.1.2broadcast IP
> > > 192.168.1.3
> > >
> > > b) Second subnet 192.168.1.4/27 --> valid host 192.168.1.5 to
> > 192.168.1.34 ?
> > >
> > > and next subnet /28 and next subnet /30 ??????????
> > >
> > >
> > > OR
> > >
> > > It has to be either 192.168.1.0/26 or /27 or 38, I mean the whole
> subnet
> > > ?????
> > >
> > > REgards,
> > >
> > > Frog
> > >
> > > Ans of 2nd Qusetion ) Subnet mask for /25 will be 255.255.255.128 (
> > Here U
> > > can use 2
> > > valid Network subnets with 126 valid
> > host
> > > IPs in each subnet)
> > > Subnet mask for /26 will be
> > > 255.255.255.192( Here U can use 4
> > > valid Network subnets with 62 valid
> > > host IPs in each subnet)
> > > Subnet mask for /27 will be
> > > 255.255.255.224 (Here
> > > U can use 8
> > > valid Network subnets with 30 valid
> > host
> > > IPs in each subnet)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/19/06, Jai Prakash <jpjsr06@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Frog
> > >>
> > >> As per my understanding, when u take calss C as a major network and
> > >> divides into subnets, it takes all available subnets with valid
> hosts.
> > >>
> > >> In your case, if you divide 192.168.1.0/24 into subnets of 30 block
> > host
> > >> IP.........you will get 8 valid subnet blocks with each having 30
> valid
> > >> hosts IP. You can use any subnet from these 8 subnets block.
> > >>
> > >> The theory says.....don't use 1st IP and the Last IP of the subnets
> > >> because, they represent Network IP and Broadcast IP accordangliy for
> > that
> > >> particular subnet.I never seen that books says don't use 1st subnet
> and
> > >> last subnet, when you divide Major Network into subnets.
> > >>
> > >> The whole discussion outcome is :
> > >>
> > >> Ans of 1st Qusetion ) U can use 1st and Last subnet of Major Network
> > >>
> > >> Ans of 2nd Qusetion ) Subnet mask for /25 will be 255.255.255.128 (
> > Here
> > >> U can use 2
> > >> valid Network subnets with 126 valid
> > host
> > >> IPs in each subnet)
> > >> Subnet mask for /26 will be
> > >> 255.255.255.192 ( Here U can use 4
> > >> valid Network subnets with 62 valid
> > >> host IPs in each subnet)
> > >> Subnet mask for /27 will be
> > >> 255.255.255.224 (Here U can use 8
> > >> valid Network subnets with 30 valid
> > host
> > >> IPs in each subnet)
> > >>
> > >> Correct me , if I m wrong................
> > >>
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Jai
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 5/18/06, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Guys,
> > >>>
> > >>> Very basic question but lots of doubt.
> > >>>
> > >>> 1) First question:
> > >>>
> > >>> If class C subnet 192.168.1.0 is routed to ISP-B (small) by ISP-A
> (BIG
> > >>> ISP).
> > >>> When ISP B starts subneting the 192.168.1.0 IP block for different
> > >>> customer
> > >>> why do he starts distributing from the first subnet from
> > 192.168.1.0/24
> > >>> (which sholdn't be used)???????????
> > >>> The books and theory says first and last subnet shouldn't be used
> (as
> > >>> network and broadcast subnets), hence we shouldn't use the
> > >>> 192.168.1.0/24(first <http://192.168.1.0/24%28first> subnet)
> > >>>
> > >>> Means the ISP should start distributing from second subnets e.g.
> > >>> 192.168.1.32 (see below).
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> Subnet , Valid Hosts , Broadcast
> > >>> 192.168.1.0 , 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.30 ,
> > 192.168.1.31
> > >>> 192.168.1.32 , 192.168.1.33 to 192.168.1.62 ,
> 192.168.1.63
> > >>> 192.168.1.64 , 192.168.1.65 to 192.168.1.94 ,
> 192.168.1.95
> > >>> 192.168.1.96 , 192.168.1.97 to 192.168.1.126 ,
> > 192.168.1.127
> > >>> 192.168.1.128 , 192.168.1.129 to 192.168.1.158 ,
> > 192.168.1.159
> > >>> 192.168.1.160 , 192.168.1.161 to 192.168.1.190 ,
> > 192.168.1.191
> > >>> 192.168.1.192 , 192.168.1.193 to 192.168.1.222 ,
> > 192.168.1.223
> > >>> 192.168.1.224 , 192.168.1.225 to 192.168.1.254 ,
> > 192.168.1.255
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 1) Second question:
> > >>>
> > >>> What if ISP starts distributing /25 /26 /27 IP blocks from
> > >>> 192.168.1.0/24 IP
> > >>> block to the customers ? In this case what subnet mask shouldn't be
> > used
> > >>> (still first and the last in 192.168.1.0/24 blocks) ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Appreciate your answers to this basic topic!
> > >>>
> > >>> Frog!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Message transport security by GatewayDefender.com
> 9:21:49 AM ET - 5/19/2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:22 ART