From: Tony Paterra (apaterra@gmail.com)
Date: Thu May 18 2006 - 21:59:00 ART
Roberto,
1.) Yup
2.) For similar (i.e. inter-area vs. inter-area)
3.) Try virtual-linking area 1 up so that you are now are comparing
apples to apples.
Can anyone elaborate in more detail?
On 5/18/06, Roberto Fernandez <rofernandez@us.telefonica.com> wrote:
> Friends,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your previous answers, can we establish the following?
>
>
>
> 1 - OSPF always prefers intra-area over inter-area.
>
> This means that given an existing intra-area route, for a given
> destination; there is no way to trick OSPF into including on the routing
> table an inter-area route (for the same destination), regardless the
> metric values.
>
>
>
> 2 - The only way to trick OSPF into including new routes on the routing
> table for a given destination is working on metrics, (through interface
> cost, neighbor cost or auto cost)
>
>
>
> Now a remaining question:
>
>
>
> If there are two inter-area routes on a given ABR (R2), one coming
> through area0 (through R1) and the other coming from area1(through R2),
> It is there any known trick to make OSPF include the area1 route
> together with the area0 route?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---R2--
>
> / |
>
> A-0 / |
>
> / |
>
> R1 | A-1
>
> \ |
>
> A-0 \ |
>
> \ |
>
> --- R3--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Roberto
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Tony Paterra apaterra@gmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART