From: Mark Lasarko (mlasarko@co.ba.md.us)
Date: Thu May 18 2006 - 18:29:45 ART
Nice!
I was sincerely curious, not that I deploy the 1800 series, but in general.
We just melted-down some 7300's (HW & SW) at a CPOC last month and this was a
reference I could not even get from Cisco :(
On another note, this becomes a recursive (and rhetorical) topic as the tests
run by Miercom do not reflect what Cisco has noted in this document - Miercom
does note UDP, Cisco just says "IP", but still I wonder?
One answer leads to yet another question!
I'm just not sure what that question is... no proctor to ask... route to
Null0
Thank You Very Much, Marvin :)
~M
>>> Marvin Greenlee <marvingreenlee@yahoo.com> 05/18/06 3:23 PM >>>
Raw performance - no services - 64 byte reference
sheet -
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.p
df
--- Mark Lasarko <mlasarko@co.ba.md.us> wrote:
> Thanx, the second link worked.
> Tests with "large packets" do not impress me.
> Chuck summed it up nicely in his reply to the post.
> I would like to see the pps throughput with 64 byte
> packets...
> ~M
>
> >>> Richard Dumoulin <Richard.Dumoulin@vanco.fr>
> 05/18/06 10:23 AM >>>
>
>
> www.miercom.com/dl.html?fid=20040904&type=report
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART