From: Bajo (bajoalex@gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 15 2006 - 16:40:38 ART
R4 will see 2.2.2.0 as Type-5 LSA, if R1 if advertised it, say, via red
connected. Yes it will be Type 3 LSA if 2.2.2.0 is part of area 1.
On 5/15/06, CCIEin2006 <ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> If I expand my diagram a little:
>
> 2.2.2.0--(R1)--Area1--(R2)--Area0--(R3)--Area1---(R4)
>
> Let say you have 2.2.2.0 advertised by R1, will R4 simply see it as a LSA
> type 3 summary or will it see it as an intra-area route?
> My guess is it will see it as any other type 3 summary and has no
> knowledge of the other Area1.
>
>
>
> On 5/15/06, Bajo <bajoalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Area 0 does not see them discontiguousand and has no problem with it.
> > labbed it up too. The routes from R2 and R3 show up as internal to each
> > other.
> >
> > On 5/15/06, CCIEin2006 < ciscocciein2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In the following scenario you can see Area1 is discontiguous:
> >
> > (R1)--Area1--(R2)--Area0--(R3)--Area1---(R4)
> >
> > Does Area0 view these as two separate areas? What kind of problems will
> > occur?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kind Regards,
> >
> >
> > Bajo
> >
>
>
-- Kind Regards,Bajo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART