From: Magmax (magmax@bigpond.net.au)
Date: Sat May 13 2006 - 04:51:16 ART
Good one I have done this mistake too :)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Shamin
Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2006 5:33 PM
To: Edward
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Prefix-list issue!
Thanx edward,
The "prefix" keywork was missing in the distrribute-list command. Now its
working. My mistake.
Another I notices is, If I create a Prefix list with the name RIP_UPDATE, I
also see a standard named access-list with the same name created without any
permit or deny statement.
This shows up in "Show ip access-lists" command output as well.
I think, the distribute-list command in my configuration was referring to
this Access-list RIP_UPDATE instead of the Prefix-list RIP_UPDATE and was
allowing all the routes.
Any reason why this named access-list was created automatically.
Actually in My lab , the R1 i have mentioned above is actually the 3550
switch with 12.2 IOS. Just Mentioned R1 ,to make things simpler.
regards
shamin
On 5/13/06, Edward <edwlui@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Shamin,
>
> Try this one :
>
> distribute-list prefix RIP_UPDATE out ethernet0/1
>
>
>
> Edward
>
> On 5/12/06, Shamin <ccie.xpert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> I had the
> ip prefix-list RIP_UPDATE seq 16 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 statement on the
> router. But this only helps in sending other networks other than
> 163.1.57.0/24 to R2. I didnt type it as my main concern was not to send
> the
> 163.1.57.0/24. Now without the paermit any statement in the prefix-list,
> the
> default will be to deny everything. But that also does not block the
> network
> 163.1.57.0/24 from being send to R2.
>
> It works with offset-list perfectly. But wondering why not with
> distribute-list.
>
> regards
> shamin
>
>
>
> On 5/13/06, Magmax < magmax@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > ip prefix-list RIP_UPDATE seq 16 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 is missing
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Shamin
> > Sent: Saturday, 13 May 2006 4:17 PM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: Prefix-list issue!
> >
> > HI,
> >
> > I have a problem with Prefix list!
> >
> > 163.1.57.7/24
> > <-------(e0/0) R1(e0/1) -------(RIPv2)------- R2 ----->
> >
> > I have an ethernet interface on R1 which has ip 163.1.57.7/24 . There
> are
> > other interfaces on R1 which are part of the Class B network
> > 163.1.0.0.RIPv2 is run between R1 and R2. What i am trying to acheive
> > is, To not send
> > the 163.1.57.0/24 network to R2 with the help of a Prefix-list and
> > Distribute-list.But things arent working.
> >
> > My config on R1 is as below:
> >
> > R1#
> >
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > passive-interface default
> > no passive-interface e0/1
> > network 163.1.0.0
> > distribute-list RIP_UPDATE out ethernet0/1
> > no auto-summary
> > !
> > ip prefix-list RIP_UPDATE seq 5 deny 163.1.57.0/24
> >
> >
> > With the above config , I still see the route to 163.1.57.0 on R2. But
> if
> > I
> > use Offset list on R1 with the same prefix-list configured, the route
> does
> > not install on R2. But i need to accomplish this using a Prefix-list.
> Any
> > thing I am missing out here?
> >
> > regards
> > shamin
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART