From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 11:47:21 ART
Look at the various distance commands under the routing process, either
defaults or specific routes.
Dave Schulz
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
george stanza
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:30 AM
To: Savjani, Hitesh, WWCS
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: problem with redistribution between two eigrp processes
i realized what the problem is..On R2, i see that the distance for the
route
to the 'interface that is directly connected to R4 (from R1) is 170 and
is
external, so the path that is taken is the one thru R3 since its
distaance
is only 90. Do you know how & where I can modify the distance to reflect
to
less then 170 ?
//G
On 5/10/06, george stanza <cert2006@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Appolize, that was a big typo in my post.. Here is what it reads..
>
> router eigrp 5
> redistribute eigrp 6 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
>
> network 21.21.1.2 0.0.0.0
> distribute-list 10 out Ethernet4/1.1
>
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 1.1.1.1
> !
> router eigrp 6
> redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
> network 100.100.1.1 0.0.0.0
> network 21.21.10.5 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 2.2.2.2
> !
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/10/06, Savjani, Hitesh, WWCS <hitesh@att.com> wrote:
> >
> > George,
> >
> > I see that you are redistributing EIGRP 5 into EIGRP 5. I think it's
a
> > typo.
> > Basically Process 5 doesn't know how to send the packets back to
Process
> >
> > 6.
> >
> > My 2 cents ....
> >
> > Hitesh
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On
Behalf Of
> > george stanza
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:43 AM
> > To: Cisco certification
> > Subject: problem with redistribution between two eigrp processes
> >
> > team,
> >
> > I am dead-struck on a simple redistribution problem and i am not
sure
> > what
> > is happening. The topology is as follows::
> > lo0 lo0 lo0
> > 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3
> > R4 <------->R1 <---------> R2 <-------> R3
> > e0 e1 e0 e1 e0
> >
> > There is EIGRP 5 between R4 & R1 and there is EIGRP 6 between R1 &
R2..
> > R1 has loopback 0 as 1.1.1.1 and R2 as 2.2.2.2 and so on..
> > Also, R1's Loop0 is in EIGRP 5 and R1's Loop1 (which is 100.100.1.1
) is
> > in
> > EIGRP 6
> > From R2, i am able to ping e1 of R1 but not the loopback or E0 of
R1.
> > The
> > configuration is as follows (for R1)..any idea what i am missing
here ?.
> >
> > R1:
> > ===
> > router eigrp 5
> > redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
> > network 21.21.1.2 0.0.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> > eigrp router-id 1.1.1.1
> > !
> > router eigrp 6
> > timers active-time 10
> > redistribute eigrp 5 metric 10000 2000 255 1 1500
> > network 100.100.1.1 0.0.0.0
> > network 21.21.10.5 0.0.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> > eigrp router-id 100.100.1.1
> > !
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART