From: Tony Schaffran (groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Wed May 10 2006 - 01:18:38 ART
Agreed.
Each vendor does have a forum for workbook specific questions.
GS should not become those forums.
For a better result, people might want to try to re-word their questions as
Paul mentioned a few days ago. It is much easier for us to assist with a
technology question than it is with a workbook question.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
kwasi-ccie@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:54 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: kwas-ccie@comcast.net
Subject: Vendor Lab Qestions on Group Study
I have noticed quite recently that too many vendor lab questions are being
posted on Group Study without any details what-so-ever. I find this quite
annoying, to say the least. Not everyone owns every vendor lab out there,
you
know. All of these vendors have portals for discussing these things, why
post
them on GS, especially if you're not going to fully disclose the full
scenario?
I think if you're going to post these vendor lab questions on GS, at least
have
the courtesy to fully explain or paraphrase the questions, give a decent
sketch
and attach your config for all of us to understand what the scenario is.
This
was how it was done in the past.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART