From: James Ventre (messageboard@ventrefamily.com)
Date: Tue May 09 2006 - 08:44:54 ART
I may have missed the earlier part of this thread - but why not do 2
separate routed links and let OSPF load balance across them? It seems
to be much simpler and eliminates etherchannel (fewer things to break).
James
mani poopal wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> A quick question
> First 3550(int vlan 5=10.10.10.1, lo0=11.11.11.11) is connected to another 3550(interface vlan 5=10.10.10.2, lo0=12.12.12.12)(Etherchannel). Both swithces are bundled togeter through Etherchannel. If we run ospf on both swithces, there should be ospf neighbor relationship between both switches. Now the question is what is the difference/advamtage between L2 etherchannel vs L3 etherchannel. I don't have 2 3550's to test the configuration.
>
> First 3550:
> router ospf 1
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 a 0
> network 11.11.11.11 0.0.0.0 a 0
>
> Second 3550:
> router ospf 1
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 a 0
> network 12.12.12.12 0.0.0.0 a 0
>
> thanks
>
> Mani
>
>
> B.ENG,MCSE,CCNP,CCSP,CCIE#14645
> (416)431 9929
> MANI_CCIE@YAHOO.COM
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART