From: Kemal YILDIRIM (kemalhy@gmail.com)
Date: Mon May 08 2006 - 17:45:12 ART
Hi Nick,
As I know this a macro for setting a specific switch as root in a specific
VLAN, in a situation all switches with default priorities in that VLAN.
It lowers the priority to 24576, and than to 4096 (lowest value), if this
not results in root switch role, then you got error you mentioned.
I think your other switch has a priority 4096.
Just check your other switch(es) for priority.
You migth set the required priority at sprecific switch accordingly.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12225see/scg/swstp
.htm#wp1039614
Regards,
Kemal
Objects are what is unalterable and subsistent;
their configuration is what is changing and unstable.
So, you need PRACTICE, PRACTICE, AND MORE PRACTICE...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Griffin
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 12:27 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: STP Clarification
Are there ever any instances in which the "spanning-tree vlan X root
primary" command will fail to cause the configured bridge to become the
root for a particular vlan? I've seen some behavior recently that has
caused some confusion on the subject for me.
TIA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:21 ART