RE: IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 TASK 4.6 (Redundancy)

From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue May 02 2006 - 10:59:51 ART


        Disabling fast switching should not affect the connectivity.
The reason I said to disable it is that it allows you to debug transit
traffic on the router. If you "debug ip packet" on a hop by hop basis
as you are sending the traffic from R5 you will see what the problem is.

HTH,

Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shamin [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:11 AM
> To: Brian McGahan
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 TASK 4.6 (Redundancy)
>
> Brian,
>
> I have found some respite.It did not work with the ip route-cache
> command on the interfaces in the path. I tried to change the source ip
> ( while pinging) to the loopback interface of R5 and i was able to
> get replies from R3 and R2 without any problems. Now will have to
> troubleshoot the cause of this.
>
> regards
> shamin
>
> On 5/1/06, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> > Issue the "no ip route-cache" on all interfaces in the transit
> > path and then look at the output from "debug ip packet" and "debug
ip
> > routing" when you send traffic. Trace the problem on a hop by hop
basis
> > and see what your results are.
> >
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> > bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf
> > Of
> > > Shamin
> > > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 6:44 AM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 TASK 4.6 (Redundancy)
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is in reference with IEWB VER3.0 LAB5 Task4.6
> > >
> > >
> > > R4
> > > |
> > > R5 -------FR------ R2
> > > |
> > > R3------>
> > >
> > > There is PPP over serial between R4 and R5. With the above setup i
am
> > > having full connectivity. As per the requirement of the LAB, it
states
> > > that the PPP link between R4 and R5 should come up when R5 loses
its
> > > connectivity with the FR link. And this is to be done using a
Floating
> > > static route. As expected the link does come up. The problem is
that,
> > > i am able to ping the Loopback and FR interfaces of R4 but cannot
ping
> > > the R2 or R3 or any other network beyond R4. From R2 and R3 , i am
> > > able to ping Loopback interface of R5 without any problems.I have
> > > posted all the config below.
> > >
> > > ******************X********************X****************
> > > Rack1R5# sh run
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 150.1.5.5 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > > ip address 162.1.5.5 255.255.255.0
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 162.1.0.5 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > ip ospf priority 0
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.2 504
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.3 503
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.4 504 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/1
> > > ip address 162.1.55.5 255.255.255.0
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/1
> > > ip address 162.1.45.5 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation ppp
> > > ppp reliable-link
> > > !
> > > router ospf 1
> > > router-id 150.1.5.5
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > network 150.1.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > network 162.1.0.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > network 162.1.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > network 162.1.55.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > !
> > > ip http server
> > > ip classless
> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 162.1.45.4 111
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > >
> > > Rack1R5#sh ip route
> > >
> > > Gateway of last resort is 162.1.45.4 to network 0.0.0.0
> > >
> > > 162.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
> > > C 162.1.45.4/32 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> > > C 162.1.45.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> > > C 162.1.55.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
> > > C 162.1.5.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> > > 150.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > C 150.1.5.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > S* 0.0.0.0/0 [111/0] via 162.1.45.4
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rack1R5#ping 150.1.3.3
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.1.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > > .....
> > > Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
> > >
> > > The FR on R5 is inactive as I shut the interface to R5 on the FR
> > switch.
> > >
> > >
> >
*************************X**********************X***********************
> > **
> > > ***
> > >
> > > Rack1R4# sh run
> > >
> > > !
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 150.1.4.4 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > > ip address 204.12.1.4 255.255.255.0
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 162.1.0.4 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > ip ospf priority 0
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.2 403
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.3 403 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.5 405 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/1
> > > ip address 162.1.45.4 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation ppp
> > > clockrate 64000
> > > ppp reliable-link
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet1/0
> > > no ip address
> > > shutdown
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > router ospf 1
> > > router-id 150.1.4.4
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > redistribute static subnets
> > > network 150.1.4.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > network 162.1.0.4 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > !
> > > router rip
> > > version 2
> > > network 204.12.1.0
> > > no auto-summary
> > > !
> > > ip http server
> > > ip classless
> > > ip route 150.1.5.5 255.255.255.255 162.1.45.5 111
> > > ip route 162.1.5.0 255.255.255.0 162.1.45.5 111
> > > ip route 162.1.55.0 255.255.255.0 162.1.45.5 111
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rack1R4#sh ip route
> > > Gateway of last resort is 162.1.0.3 to network 0.0.0.0
> > >
> > > C 204.12.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> > > 162.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks
> > > C 162.1.45.5/32 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> > > C 162.1.45.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> > > S 162.1.55.0/24 [111/0] via 162.1.45.5
> > > C 162.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> > > S 162.1.5.0/24 [111/0] via 162.1.45.5
> > > O IA 162.1.27.0/24 [110/74] via 162.1.0.2, 00:19:07, Serial0/0
> > > 31.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> > > R 31.3.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:09, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 31.2.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:09, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 31.1.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:09, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 31.0.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:09, Ethernet0/0
> > > 150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks
> > > C 150.1.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > O IA 150.1.7.7/32 [110/75] via 162.1.0.2, 00:19:09, Serial0/0
> > > S 150.1.5.5/32 [111/0] via 162.1.45.5
> > > O 150.1.3.3/32 [110/65] via 162.1.0.3, 00:19:09, Serial0/0
> > > O 150.1.2.2/32 [110/65] via 162.1.0.2, 00:19:09, Serial0/0
> > > 30.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 4 subnets
> > > R 30.2.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:11, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 30.3.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:11, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 30.0.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:11, Ethernet0/0
> > > R 30.1.0.0 [120/1] via 204.12.1.254, 00:00:11, Ethernet0/0
> > > O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 162.1.0.3, 00:19:09, Serial0/0
> > >
> > >
> >
*********************X*****************************X********************
> > **
> > > ****
> > >
> > > Rack1R3#sh run
> > > !
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 150.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > > ip address 162.1.38.3 255.255.255.0
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 162.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.2 302 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.4 304 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.0.5 305 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/1
> > > ip address 162.1.3.3 255.255.255.0
> > > half-duplex
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/1
> > > ip address 162.1.13.3 255.255.255.0
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > frame-relay map ip 162.1.13.1 311 broadcast
> > > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/2
> > > no ip address
> > > shutdown
> > > !
> > > router eigrp 200
> > > redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 1000 100 1 1500
> > > network 162.1.3.3 0.0.0.0
> > > network 162.1.13.3 0.0.0.0
> > > network 162.1.38.3 0.0.0.0
> > > no auto-summary
> > > !
> > > router ospf 1
> > > router-id 150.1.3.3
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > network 150.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > network 162.1.0.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > neighbor 162.1.0.5
> > > neighbor 162.1.0.2
> > > neighbor 162.1.0.4
> > > default-information originate always
> > > !
> > >
> > >
> > > Rack1R3#sh ip route
> > >
> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > >
> > > 51.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > D EX 51.51.51.51 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:28,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 222.22.2.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:28,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 220.20.3.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:28,
Serial0/1
> > > 99.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > D 99.9.9.9 [90/409600] via 162.1.38.8, 02:16:16, Ethernet0/0
> > > 20.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > D EX 20.20.20.20 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:28,
Serial0/1
> > > 54.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > D EX 54.1.1.0 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29, Serial0/1
> > > 162.1.0.0/24 is subnetted, 7 subnets
> > > C 162.1.38.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> > > O E2 162.1.55.0 [110/20] via 162.1.0.4, 00:02:48, Serial0/0
> > > C 162.1.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0/1
> > > C 162.1.0.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> > > O E2 162.1.5.0 [110/20] via 162.1.0.4, 00:02:48, Serial0/0
> > > C 162.1.13.0 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> > > O IA 162.1.27.0 [110/74] via 162.1.0.2, 00:02:48, Serial0/0
> > > D EX 212.18.1.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 212.18.0.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 212.18.3.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 212.18.2.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > D EX 192.10.1.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > 150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7 subnets, 2 masks
> > > D EX 150.1.6.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:29,
Serial0/1
> > > C 150.1.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> > > D 150.1.1.0/24 [90/2297856] via 162.1.13.1, 02:27:36,
Serial0/1
> > > O IA 150.1.7.7/32 [110/75] via 162.1.0.2, 00:02:48, Serial0/0
> > > O E2 150.1.5.5/32 [110/20] via 162.1.0.4, 00:02:49, Serial0/0
> > > O 150.1.4.4/32 [110/65] via 162.1.0.4, 00:02:49, Serial0/0
> > > O 150.1.2.2/32 [110/65] via 162.1.0.2, 00:02:49, Serial0/0
> > > D EX 205.90.31.0/24 [170/2425856] via 162.1.13.1, 01:45:30,
Serial0/1
> > > Rack1R3#
> > >
> > >
> > > Rack1R3#ping 150.1.5.5
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 150.1.5.5, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > > !!!!!
> > > Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
96/96/100
> > ms
> > >
> > > Rack1R3#traceroute 150.1.5.5
> > >
> > > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > > Tracing the route to 150.1.5.5
> > >
> > > 1 162.1.0.4 32 msec 36 msec 32 msec
> > > 2 162.1.45.5 52 msec * 48 msec
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
***************************X**********************X*********************
> > **
> > > **************
> > >
> > > R3 has got a path through R4 to R5 and back.But R5 is not able to
go
> > > further from R4. I have redistributed the statis routes on R4 as
well.
> > > Cant find what would be the reason.
> > >
> > > Your help is much appreciated!
> > >
> > > regards
> > > shamin
> > >
> > >
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 01 2006 - 06:33:20 ART