RE: FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION

From: Luis Rueda (luis.rueda@comsat.com.co)
Date: Sun Apr 30 2006 - 16:28:35 GMT-3

Next message: Michael: "RE: NTP authentication"
Previous message: Magmax: "RE: Will half a packet be sent?"
Maybe in reply to: Luis Rueda: "FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION"
Next in thread: CCIE 4 Me: "Re: FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ubaid,

Are you sure ? Why do you say the second one ? Just want to make sure
I'm doing the right things.

Regards,

Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de
Magmax
Enviado el: Sunday, April 30, 2006 1:43 PM
Para: Luis Rueda; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Asunto: RE: FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION

Second one should be fine

ubaid

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Luis Rueda
Sent: Monday, 1 May 2006 4:24 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION

Hi all,

I have a question for the following scenario, let's say we have 3
routers, R1, R2, R3.

The following topology is used (Hub-Spoke) R1 is the hub, and R2 and R3
area spokes. If R3 is set with the following config:

Interface serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay ietf

How should I configure R2 and R1 with frame-relay map statements in
order to match the correct encapsulation for R3 ?

Should I set the following config:

R1 (HUB)
Interface serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay map ip 200.200.200.3 103 broadcast ietf frame-relay map ip
200.200.200.2 102 broadcast

R2 (SPOKE -CISCO ENCAPSULATION-)
Interface serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip address 200.200.200.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay map ip 200.200.200.1 201 broadcast frame-relay map ip
200.200.200.3 201 broadcast

R3 (SPOKE -IETF ENCAPSULATION-)
Interface serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
ip address 200.200.200.3 255.255.255.0
frame-relay map ip 200.200.200.1 301 broadcast frame-relay map ip
200.200.200.2 301 broadcast

Or should I set it up this way:

R1 (HUB)
Interface serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
ip address 200.200.200.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay map ip 200.200.200.3 103 broadcast ietf frame-relay map ip
200.200.200.2 102 broadcast

Regards,

Luis

Next message: Michael: "RE: NTP authentication"
Previous message: Magmax: "RE: Will half a packet be sent?"
Maybe in reply to: Luis Rueda: "FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION"
Next in thread: CCIE 4 Me: "Re: FRAME-RELAY ENCAPSULATION QUESTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3