From: Marius Venter (marius@aict.co.za)
Date: Sat Apr 29 2006 - 02:09:16 GMT-3
I recon it is easier to troubleshoot and manage if you use the loopback
address.
You have to careful of what they want though.
I also always configure next-hop-self as a standard configuration to
simplify my troubleshooting but then this might not be what they are looking
for when running the "script".
I will most certainly clear it with the proctor first.
Marius Venter
If it is not explicitly stated, IMO you should ask a proctor if it is
relevant.
on 27/04/2006 19:46 John Aitken wrote:
> Wonder if anyone could enlighten me on a BGP question I have. As a rule
with
> BGP I generally peer to loopbacks and ebgp-multihop/change update source
> unless there's a particular requirement not too or it's not in IGP route
> table for some reaosn. If it's not explicitly stated in the exam to do
this,
> is it still valid - i.e. would I lose points for not peering to
neighboring
> interfaces (assuming it's not explicitly stated)?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3