From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Thu Apr 27 2006 - 14:50:00 GMT-3
I would not think so, John. However, you'll want to watch for wording
that says to insure that BGP stays up if the link goes down. IOW, it
has reachability through a different network segment.
Dave Schulz,
Email: dschulz@dpsciences.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John Aitken
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: BGP exam practice question
Wonder if anyone could enlighten me on a BGP question I have. As a rule
with
BGP I generally peer to loopbacks and ebgp-multihop/change update source
unless there's a particular requirement not too or it's not in IGP route
table for some reaosn. If it's not explicitly stated in the exam to do
this,
is it still valid - i.e. would I lose points for not peering to
neighboring
interfaces (assuming it's not explicitly stated)?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3