From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 12:58:06 GMT-3
The first sets weight 1000 from ANYTHING learned from that peer. The second
COULD be more specific (though isn't by that AS-Path).
Just different criteria for what you're trying to accomplish.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of tony
hall
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 11:34 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: BGP WEIGHT
Hi Group,
I hope someone can explain me the diffrence between 2 commands.
1-
router bgp 100
neigh 10.10.10.2 weight 1000 <----------------ebgp peer with AS 200
2-
router bgp 100
neigh 10.10.10.2 route-map WT in <---------ebgp peer with AS 200
route-map WT
match as-path 1
set weight 1000
ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^200_
Regards.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:59 GMT-3