Re: Cisco MWR-1941 LUB optimization

From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2006 - 20:36:11 GMT-3


Kevin,
Thanks for your reply. Can you please explain whats R5 ? any url for that ?
Which product will support R5?

Thanks in advance
frog

On 4/22/06, kevin gannon <kevin@gannons.net> wrote:
>
> We dont use it however from the presentations I have
> seen it basically compresses the CODECs again and
> offers some VAD additions. The cisco figures were
> showing 30% savings over E1 transport. It might also
> be worth looking at ATM contention on the backend
> I know we moved from Nokia ATM switches to Lucent
> PSAX's to groom the B node links and made some
> good transport savings.
>
> You might be better waiting for R5 to do IP to the edge.
>
> Regards
> Kevin
>
>
> On 4/21/06, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> Has anybody had any experience with Cisco MWR-1941, TN/lub optimization
> over
> ETHERNET ?
> I know it's a new and hot psudeowire emolutoin over IP for optimizing and
> transporting of 3G/HSPDA traffic.
> The RNC and BTS has an LUB interface and supports ATM pvcs/svcs.
>
> Any good docs which shows how the technology works?
>
> Thanks
>
> Frog.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:58 GMT-3