From: devecchio (devecchio.turner@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri Apr 21 2006 - 15:07:08 GMT-3
I recall a link from my ccna days that mentioned this......there was a
command that allowed you to change the way this command was entered...hold
one sec..........
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sharifi, Reza
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:41 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: One of those wrong days
Talking about Juniper and Cisco. Is it in any of IOS future releases
that we could do 10.0.0.1/24 instead of 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
Or 1/8 instead of 1.0.0.0 255.0.0.0?
It is just so much faster.
Thanks,
Reza
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:09 AM
To: 'Victor Cappuccio'; 'Brian Dennis'
Cc: 'csica'; 'CCIE LAB'; 'Jeffrey Fry'
Subject: RE: One of those wrong days
There are some new features in the 12.4 set for "archive" that are
working
along those lines of configuration maintenance. Otherwise, there are
many
third-party programs (Kiwi, Solarwinds, Rancid, etc.) for config
maintenance.
Rollback is a WAY cool feature though, and it's been around since the
dawn
of JUNOS. (Does that mean Cisco "stole" it from Juniper?)
As for the "who stole what" ideas... Isn't that the concept of
competition
anyway? Once one has a cool idea, if enough people like it, soon
everyone
has something similar. :) Your PIX virtual firewalls came because of
Netscreen (now Juniper). I don't view this as a bad thing at all.
Both Cisco and Juniper have their places within networks. Both have
benefits and both have problems. Both can be defended in different
circumstances, but it's always good to know the options available to
you!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
smorris@ipexpert.com
http://www.ipexpert.com
PS. I defend both platforms in different circumstances. ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:32 PM
To: Brian Dennis
Cc: csica; CCIE LAB; Jeffrey Fry
Subject: Re: One of those wrong days
Brian, is there any command similar to the Juniper to rollback a
configuration? (did I say that I do not know anything about juniper) It
would be nice to have something like this when doing Maintenance
Windows.
:)
Brian Dennis escribis:
Juniper was founded in 1996 and the "reload" command with the "in"
option first appeared in IOS version 10.3. Since IOS version 10.3 was
released in 1995 it appears you have it backwards ;-)
If you ever want to discuss Cisco vs Juniper be sure to check out our
IRC chat server. I'm regularly in there defending all things Cisco
related ;-)
http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc. http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On
Behalf Of
csica
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 7:23 PM
To: CCIE LAB; Jeffrey Fry
Subject: RE: One of those wrong days
Yup....just another feature Cisco stole from Juniper.
(oops...did I say that out loud???) :D
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Jeffrey Fry" <Jeff@FryGuy.Net> Reply-To: "Jeffrey Fry"
<Jeff@FryGuy.Net> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:51:08 -0400
Been there before, just glad the reload in command works :)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [
mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com
] On Behalf Of
Nick Griffin
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:41 PM
To: m destienne
Cc: CCIE LAB
Subject: Re: One of those wrong days
I could see the humor in it.
m destienne wrote:
i don't think victor is having an issue. he locked himself from
his
router but he was smart enough to issue the reload command before
issuing the aaa commands.
he's providing a real life example of the usefulness of the reload
command.
--- john matijevic <john.matijevic@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Victor,
I am sorry I don't understand your question. So what is the
issue
you
are having?
Sincerely,
John
On 4/18/06, Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>
wrote:
just happy sharing a moment with friends
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa new-model
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa authentication login default
group tacacs+ local
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa authorization
config-commands
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa authorization exec default
group tacacs+ local
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa authorization commands 15
default group tacacs+
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa accounting exec default
start-stop group tacacs+
% Authorization failed.
cha-gw-01(config)#aaa accounting commands 15
default start-stop group
tacacs+
% Authorization failed.
cha-gw-01#conf te
% Authorization failed.
cha-gw-01#show reload
Reload scheduled in 6 minutes by console
***
*** --- SHUTDOWN in 0:05:00 ---
***
Boleita-Sw#show reload
Reload scheduled in 2 minutes and 34 seconds by
console
Good Lord, how long are 2 min and 34 sec when you
incorrecly configure
AAA in a production environment, hope no to have
more fun when when sw
reloads it self without notification..
;)
______________________________________________________________________
_
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
--
John Matijevic, CCIE #13254
U.S. Installation Group
Senior Network Engineer
954-969-7160 ext. 1147 (office)
305-321-6232 (cell)
______________________________________________________________________
_
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
______________________________________________________________________
_ Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:58 GMT-3