From: Chris Lewis (chrlewiscsco@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2006 - 10:58:28 GMT-3
Forget that, you've probably got dynamic mappings. I'd check to make sure
all your PIM neighbors are setup first and simplify your config to the bare
minimum and look at the output of debug ip mpack. You will probbaly want to
configure no ip mroute-cache on all PIM interfaces also.
Chris
On 4/19/06, Chris Lewis <chrlewiscsco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like you are using the physical interfaces for teh frame relay
> connection between BB1 and R6. If so, I would have expected to see frame
> relay map statements in those interfaces.
>
> You won't get multicast connectivity until unicast is working!
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 4/19/06, Vikram Dadlaney <vdadlaney@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Shameen,
> >
> > From your topology it doesn't seem like you have any alternate paths.
> > Can
> > you confirm this? Your OIL list on R6 is empty hence you are not
> > forwarding
> > the multicast traffic. Can you post the the configs of R2. Also have you
> > tried clearing all your neighbors. The 'ip mroute' influences the RPF
> > check.
> > If you have multicast enabled on all interfaces than it should not
> > matter
> > but say you have an alternate path and you haven't enabled multicast on
> > that
> > but the unicast routing table is choosing that path than you will have a
> > RPF
> > failure. Please do let us know if the problem has been resolved. HTH.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vikram
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:58 GMT-3