From: Jens Petter Eikeland (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Tue Apr 18 2006 - 09:47:06 GMT-3
What if I user gre tunnels from R1 to R100 and a new tunnel from R100 to R2
and all other locations?
Would not that be posible?
Jens
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jens
Petter Eikeland
Sent: 18. april 2006 14:34
To: alexeim@orcsoftware.com
Cc: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: vlan tagging
So since this is a ppp interface (virtual template) this will not be posible
to support?....
Jens
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexei Monastyrnyi [mailto:alexeim@orcsoftware.com]
Sent: 18. april 2006 14:23
To: Jens Petter Eikeland
Cc: 'Cisco certification'
Subject: Re: vlan tagging
since your PPP link is a new (and different from LAN type of) media, the
whole L2 header/tail will have to be re-built and no VLAN tag will be
passed through.
A.
on 18/04/2006 13:46 Jens Petter Eikeland wrote:
> Hi group,
>
>
>
> I have a question regarding vlan tagging..This is the topology..
>
>
>
> SW1-R1------R100-----R2-SW2
>
>
>
> I need the vlan from behind sw 1 and sw 2 to be able to communicate. The
> connection
> between R1 to R100 and R2 to R100 is a ppp coming in on a virual template.
>
>
>
>
>
> Since I am not able to configure dot1Q encap on this virtual interface,
will
> this interface
> then strip this vlan tagging on a packet on its way from SW1 to SW2???
>
>
>
> Can somebody please explain to me a little bit around this?
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards, Jens
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3