From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar (ccie.xpert@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 18 2006 - 00:38:29 GMT-3
Faryar,
Thanx, That was indeed the problem. I configured
ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.1.0.0 255.255.252.0 5 instead of
ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 5.
Silly mistake from my side. Will never forget this one again!
Thanks for all your inputs,
regards
On 4/17/06, Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi) <fzabihi@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> I don't see the summary address in the routing table...also I think the
> summary-address needs to be
> ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.1.0.0 255.255.252.0 5
> For the routes coming from the backbone...
>
>
>
> Faryar Zabihi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 11:41 AM
> To: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
>
> The config on R6 is as below:
>
> Rack1R6#
>
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 150.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0
> no ip address
> half-duplex
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.6
> encapsulation dot1Q 6 native
> ip address 132.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> no snmp trap link-status
> !
> interface Ethernet0/0.26
> encapsulation dot1Q 26
> ip address 132.1.26.6 255.255.255.0
> ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 5 no snmp trap
> link-status !
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 54.1.2.6 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> no fair-queue
> !
> interface TokenRing0/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> ring-speed 16
> !
> interface Ethernet1/0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> half-duplex
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 54.1.2.6 0.0.0.0
> network 132.1.26.6 0.0.0.0
> network 150.1.6.6 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 150.1.6.6
> neighbor 132.1.26.2 Ethernet0/0.26
> !
> ip http server
> *****************************X*****************X************************
> *****
>
> The configuration on BB1 is as follows:
>
> BB1#
>
> !
> !
> !
> !
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 200.1.0.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 200.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback2
> ip address 200.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback3
> ip address 200.1.3.1 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Loopback11
> ip address 150.1.11.11 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial0
> ip address 54.1.2.254 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> shutdown
> !
> router eigrp 10
> network 54.1.2.254 0.0.0.0
> network 150.1.11.11 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.0.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.2.1 0.0.0.0
> network 200.1.3.1 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> eigrp router-id 150.1.11.11
> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> router rip
> network 204.12.1.0
> !
> ip classless
> ip http server
> *************************X*******************X**************************
> **
>
> The sh ip route on R6 is as follows:
>
> Rack1R6#
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> D EX 204.12.1.0/24 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:43,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D 200.1.0.0/24 [90/2297856] via 54.1.2.254, 00:08:45, Serial0/0
> 54.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 54.1.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> D 200.1.1.0/24 [90/2297856] via 54.1.2.254, 00:08:45, Serial0/0
> D 200.1.2.0/24 [90/2297856] via 54.1.2.254, 00:08:45, Serial0/0
> D 200.1.3.0/24 [90/2297856] via 54.1.2.254, 00:08:45, Serial0/0
> 132.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 9 subnets, 2 masks
> D EX 132.1.0.4/32 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:44,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> C 132.1.6.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.6
> D EX 132.1.0.1/32 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:44,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D EX 132.1.3.0/24 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:44,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D 132.1.23.0/24 [90/2195456] via 132.1.26.2, 00:07:38,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D EX 132.1.17.0/24
> [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45, Ethernet0/0.26
> C 132.1.26.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0.26
> D EX 132.1.33.0/24
> [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45, Ethernet0/0.26
> D 132.1.35.0/24 [90/2707456] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> 150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 2 masks
> D EX 150.1.7.0/24 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> C 150.1.6.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> D 150.1.5.0/24 [90/2835456] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D 150.1.3.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D 150.1.2.0/24 [90/409600] via 132.1.26.2, 00:07:39,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D EX 150.1.4.4/32 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:45,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D EX 150.1.1.1/32 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:46,
> Ethernet0/0.26
> D 150.1.11.0/24 [90/2297856] via 54.1.2.254, 00:08:47, Serial0/0
> 150.3.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 150.3.11.0 [170/2560537856] via 132.1.26.2, 00:05:46,
> Ethernet0/0.26
>
> *****************X**************************X***************************
> **********
> The show ip route on R2:
>
> Rack1R2#
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> D EX 204.12.1.0/24 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:42, Serial0/1
> D 200.1.0.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:36, Ethernet0/0
> 54.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D 54.1.2.0 [90/2195456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:36, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.1.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:36, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.2.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:36, Ethernet0/0
> D 200.1.3.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:36, Ethernet0/0
> 132.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 2 masks
> D EX 132.1.0.4/32 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> D EX 132.1.0.1/32 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> C 132.1.0.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0
> D EX 132.1.3.0/24 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> O 132.1.0.3/32 [110/64] via 132.1.0.3, 00:18:21, Serial0/0
> C 132.1.23.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/1
> D EX 132.1.17.0/24 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> C 132.1.26.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/0
> D EX 132.1.33.0/24 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> D 132.1.35.0/24 [90/2681856] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43, Serial0/1
> 150.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 2 masks
> D EX 150.1.7.0/24 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> D 150.1.6.0/24 [90/409600] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:37, Ethernet0/0
> D 150.1.5.0/24 [90/2809856] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43, Serial0/1
> D 150.1.3.0/24 [90/2297856] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43, Serial0/1
> C 150.1.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0
> D EX 150.1.4.4/32 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:43,
> Serial0/1
> D EX 150.1.1.1/32 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:44,
> Serial0/1
> D 150.1.11.0/24 [90/2323456] via 132.1.26.6, 00:08:38, Ethernet0/0
> 150.3.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> D EX 150.3.11.0 [109/2560512256] via 132.1.23.3, 00:06:44, Serial0/1
>
> ***************X**********************X*********************************
> **********
>
> The connection topology is as below:
>
> (Other routers)-----OSPF------ R2 ----EIGRP--- R6 ----EIGRP---- BB1
> |
> EIGRP
> |
> (Other routers)
>
>
> On 4/17/06, Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi) <fzabihi@cisco.com> wrote:
> > Do you get the summary route with this config? You are only
> > summarizing 200.0.1.0 - 200.0.2.0 with this statement.
> > Send me copy of sh ip route...
> > Btw, the reason I copied groupstudy on my last email is b/c thismight
> > be helpful to others as well...up to u.
> >
> > Faryar Zabihi
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:59 AM
> > To: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
> > Subject: Re: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
> >
> > Hi ,
> >
> > I will put the relevant config..
> >
> >
> > Rack1R6#
> >
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 150.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > no ip address
> > half-duplex
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0.6
> > encapsulation dot1Q 6 native
> > ip address 132.1.6.6 255.255.255.0
> > no snmp trap link-status
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0.26
> > encapsulation dot1Q 26
> > ip address 132.1.26.6 255.255.255.0
> > ip summary-address eigrp 10 200.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 5 no snmp trap
> > link-status !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 54.1.2.6 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> > no fair-queue
> > !
> > interface TokenRing0/0
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > ring-speed 16
> > !
> > interface Ethernet1/0
> > no ip address
> > shutdown
> > half-duplex
> > !
> > router eigrp 10
> > network 54.1.2.6 0.0.0.0
> > network 132.1.26.6 0.0.0.0
> > network 150.1.6.6 0.0.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> > eigrp router-id 150.1.6.6
> > neighbor 132.1.26.2 Ethernet0/0.26
> >
> >
> > Rack1R2#
> >
> >
> > !
> > !
> > interface Loopback0
> > ip address 150.1.2.2 255.255.255.0
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0/0
> > ip address 132.1.26.2 255.255.255.0
> > half-duplex
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > ip address 132.1.0.2 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> > frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> > !
> > interface Serial0/1
> > ip address 132.1.23.2 255.255.255.0
> > compress stac
> > no dce-terminal-timing-enable
> > !
> > router eigrp 10
> > network 132.1.23.2 0.0.0.0
> > network 132.1.26.2 0.0.0.0
> > network 150.1.2.2 0.0.0.0
> > distance eigrp 90 109
> > no auto-summary
> > eigrp router-id 150.1.2.2
> > neighbor 132.1.26.6 Ethernet0/0
> > !
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 150.1.2.2
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > network 132.1.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > !
> >
> > The setup is something like this. R6 is connected to R2 through eigrp
> > and R2 is connected to the rest of the network through ospf interface
> > and another eigrp interface. I get all the individual routes in the
> > 200.x.x.x range in all the other routers in the IGP domain.
> >
> >
> > regards
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > On 4/17/06, Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi) <fzabihi@cisco.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have a leak map on the summary address? Can you post your
> > > relevant config?
> > > Thnx,
> > > Faryar
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:14 PM
> > > To: Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi)
> > > Subject: Re: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
> > >
> > > Thanks , I did not advertise it. Now I did. it works. Thers another
> > > issue. I get the summary address as well as the individual
> addresses.
> > > As per the lab requirement , other routers in the eigrp domain
> > > should only see the summary address.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > shamin
> > >
> > > On 4/16/06, Faryar Zabihi (fzabihi) <fzabihi@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > > Did you advertise the routes into eigrp before summerizing?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Mohammed Shameen Abdul Jabbar
> > > [mailto:ccie.xpert@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Sun Apr 16 15:19:03 2006
> > > > To: Cisco certification
> > > > Subject: IEWB VER3.0 LAB-2 TASK-4.6
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am using the IEWB VER3.0. Doing LAB-2 TASK-4.6.
> > > > It requires to do a " ip summary-address eigrp ..." command under
> > > > a ethernet sub-interface.
> > > > The problem i face is that , I am not able to see the route I am
> > > > summarising in the routing table of other routers, I followed the
> > > > solution guide also, but not able to get it work.
> > > > In the lab workbook it is dome on a Gigabit ethernet sub interface
>
> > > > where as I am using normal ethernet sub-interface. Will this be of
>
> > > > any
> > >
> > > > implications?.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > shamin
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________________________
> > > > __ __ _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3