From: Jian Gu (guxiaojian@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2006 - 20:25:31 GMT-3
And you forgot to summarize on the router which does not have "physical"
connection to area 0. If you look at the data base, you will find that where
those component routes are originated from.
On 4/13/06, Jian Gu <guxiaojian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Most probably area 2 is also a transit area for a virtual link
>
>
> On 4/13/06, Abu Bucker <abu.bucker@gmail.com > wrote:
> >
> > i am trying to summarize the following routes a.b.8.0/24 to a.b.11.0/24
> > as
> > a.b.8.0/22 on ABR using *area 2 range a.b.8.0 255.255.252.0* (The
> > network
> > a.b.8.0 /24 to a.b.11.0 /24 belong to area 2)
> >
> > Only this summarised route should be advertised to other routers in area
> > 0
> > and routers in other areas connected to area 0, but i find the
> > individual
> > routes a.b.8.0 /24 to a.b.11.0/24 as well as the summarised route
> > a.b.8.0/22
> > in the routing table of other routers.
> >
> > Anyone got a clue to this, why its happening? I want to see only
> > summarised
> > route in the routing table of other backbone routers and routers in
> > other
> > areas.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abu Bucker
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3