From: Abu Bucker (abu.bucker@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2006 - 11:49:44 GMT-3
There is only one ABR from area 2 to area 0, but i have two interfaces (
a.b.9.1/24 & a.b.11.1/24 ) on ABR in area 2.
On 4/13/06, Brian McGahan <bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> Are there multiple ABRs from area 2 to area 0?
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
> bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> > Abu Bucker
> > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 3:58 AM
> > To: Groupstudy
> > Subject: ospf inter-area route summarization
> >
> > i am trying to summarize the following routes a.b.8.0/24 to
> a.b.11.0/24 as
> > a.b.8.0/22 on ABR using *area 2 range a.b.8.0 255.255.252.0* (The
> network
> > a.b.8.0 /24 to a.b.11.0 /24 belong to area 2)
> >
> > Only this summarised route should be advertised to other routers in
> area 0
> > and routers in other areas connected to area 0, but i find the
> individual
> > routes a.b.8.0 /24 to a.b.11.0/24 as well as the summarised route
> > a.b.8.0/22
> > in the routing table of other routers.
> >
> > Anyone got a clue to this, why its happening? I want to see only
> > summarised
> > route in the routing table of other backbone routers and routers in
> other
> > areas.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abu Bucker
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:57 GMT-3