From: Radioactive Frog (pbhatkoti@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 11:29:24 GMT-3
As ZeroFlash has explained the application is there any advantage of using
one or other ?
Frog!!
On 4/10/06, ZeroFlash <Fire_Ice@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> Also, take a look at the admin distances between using the interface vs.
> an
> address.
>
> Thanks
>
> ZeroFlash
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> xprtofnet
> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:02 AM
> To: Radioactive Frog; ccielab
> Subject: Re: Difference between ip route 0.0.0.0....S0 Vs ip route 0.0.0.0
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>
> with frame/atm use the next-hop addrs while with
> ethernet/broadcast media you can use the interface.
>
> if you use the interface with nbma media it will not
> know which dlci/vc to put the packet on thats why you
> should use the next-addrs
>
> m2c
>
> --- Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > What is the difference between
> >
> > IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0/0 Vs. ip route
> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
> >
> >
> > Both does the same job. Just wondering if anybody
> > can quickly explain the
> > application or scenario for both commands.
> >
> > means Serial 0/0 Vs next hop id (192.168.1.2) ??
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > FROG
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3