From: Schulz, Dave (DSchulz@dpsciences.com)
Date: Sun Apr 09 2006 - 00:46:51 GMT-3
Jian -
Where exactly do you have the ip pim spt-threshold command configured?
Dave
________________________________
From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Jian Gu
Sent: Sat 4/8/2006 11:31 PM
To: Bob Sinclair
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: (S,G) entries in shared tree router
I saw (S,G) entries in share tree routers where pim spt-threshold is set to
infinity for the group G throughout the multicast routers between sender and
receiver, and I want to understand the reason behind it.
On 4/8/06, Bob Sinclair <bob@bobsinclair.net> wrote:
>
> Jian,
>
>
> I would expect only (*,G) state downstream from the RP to the last-hop
> router. I would expect to find both (*,G) and (S,G) state between the RP
> and the first-hop router. What are you seeing? Does your shared tree
> overlap the SPT from the RP to the source?
>
> HTH,
>
> Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427, CCSI 30427
> www.netmasterclass.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Jian Gu <guxiaojian@gmail.com>
> *To:* Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 08, 2006 1:35 PM
> *Subject:* (S,G) entries in shared tree router
>
> Hi, all,
>
> pim spt-threshold is set to infinity, in what scenario, there will be
> (S,G)
> states on routers in shared tree routers (downstream RP)?
>
> Jian
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3