From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2006 - 02:22:40 GMT-3
As long as you have something already known in order to establish a tunnel
then that is an alternative there!
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Charlie Atwater
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:04 AM
To: swm@emanon.com
Cc: ngriffin@sio.midco.net; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Virtual Links
Could you use some type of a tunnel instead of a transit area?
--- swm@emanon.com wrote:
From: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>
To: "'Nick Griffin'" <ngriffin@sio.midco.net>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: RE: Virtual Links
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:39:44 -0400
No, not needed. Virtual link IS area 0. So that's your part right there.
Just remember to have a transit area to connect things together properly!
(grin)
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Griffin
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 3:39 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Virtual Links
Is it necessary to have one interface defined in area0 before a virtual link
will come up? I've seen some scenarios providing solutions that do not
include interfaces or loopbacks in area0, however VL's are configured. The
only way I have been able to get this to work is to have at least one
interface in area0. Thoughts appreciated.
TIA,
Nick Griffin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:56 GMT-3