From: Brian Dennis (bdennis@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 21:58:59 GMT-3
You would use secondary addressing and point additional static routes to
the secondary addresses.
Router#sho run int s0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 132 bytes
!
interface Serial0/0
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
end
Router#sho run int s0/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 74 bytes
!
interface Serial0/1
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
end
Router#sho run | in ip route
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.2.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.1.2
Router#
With this configuration S0/0 will be theoretically utilized twice as
much as S0/1.
HTH,
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Victor Cappuccio
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 2:49 PM
To: CCIE LAB
Subject: static route stupid question
Hello List, I have a real gap in my static route knowledge So please
excuse this very stupid question.- it's just that I'm far away from a
couple off routers to this test..
Could you do load balancing using static routes??
Lets say that you have
.|---------------B--------|
A |-Destination
.|---------------C--------|
Never mind the L3 L2 address resolution, let just say that they are
point to point links, so with out the use of any routing protocol, how
could you configure A to load balance (per packet based.- Process
Switching.) to B and to C, saying that you should send 3 packets to B
and 6 packets to C
Could this be possible??
Thanks
Victor.-
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 01 2006 - 11:41:55 GMT-3