From: Petr Lapukhov (petrsoft@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 31 2006 - 14:19:56 GMT-3
Hi,
AFAIK
"ip rtp priority" is designed to work with WFQ on interface (it chomps off
reserved bandwidth). So it won't work with FRTS legacy, which
forces interface queue to be FIFO (or dual FIFO).
In contrast, "frame-relay ip rtp priority" is designed to work with
FRTS and *per-VC* shaping/queueing, and requires WFQ
queueing perf-VC (frame-relay fair-queue).
HTH
Petr
2006/3/31, Akaradeth.N@datacraft-asia.com <Akaradeth.N@datacraft-asia.com>:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Anyone knows the different between these two commands, is it serving
> traffic
> in same manner?
>
>
>
> 1# interface s0/0
>
> ip rtp priority 16384 16383 256
>
>
>
> 2# map-class frame-relay FR
>
> frame ip rtp priority 16384 16383 256
>
>
>
> Please advise,
>
> Akaradeth
>
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
>
> http://www.datacraft-asia.com/disclaimer
>
>
****************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3