From: Mushtaq A. Khan (mak.ccie2b@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 26 2006 - 20:57:06 GMT-3
Thanks for the detailed config. I was ok with the config but only looking
for opinion on the wording as it was asked such as setting priority to HIGH
for "Very Critical" then what about "Critical". Should it be high or
medium?? Also, we need to config for "priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp
domain" as DNS uses Port 53 (UDP and TCP).
Mushtaq
On 3/26/06, xprtofnet <xprtofnet@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> here is my quick take on it...
>
> s0/0
> priority-group 1
>
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high udp domain
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high udp ntp
> priority-list 1 protocol ip medium tcp www
> priority-list 1 protocol ip normal tcp smtp
> priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp ftp
> priority-list 1 protocol ip low tcp ftp-data
> priority-list 1 interface Ethernet0/0 medium
>
> m2c
>
>
> --- "Mushtaq A. Khan" <mak.ccie2b@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I need your quick opinion to prioritize the list of
> > traffic to prioritize.
> > Just to be sure.
> >
> > DNS - Very Critical >>>>>>>>>>. HIGH
> > NTP - Very Critical >>>>>>>>>>. HIGH
> > HTTP - Critical >>>>>>>>>>>> .MEDIUM or HIGH
> > SMTP - Normal >>>>>>>>>>. NORMAL
> > FTP - Not Critical >>>>>>>>>>. LOW
> > ANY OTHER FROM VLAN50 - Medium >>>>>>>>>>. MEDIUM
> >
> > TIA,
> > Mushtaq
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3