From: Monty (tnoktes@comcast.net)
Date: Sun Mar 26 2006 - 04:04:02 GMT-3
Unless this box has not adsl card on it, it might cause by hardward or
software problem. Especially the interrupt type from the post is different
from the the bug below. show context, show stack and show tech might help
cisco finding the root cause.
Monty
----- Original Message -----
From: "I will Be a CCIE" <1willbeaccie@gmail.com>
To: "Victor Cappuccio" <cvictor@protokolgroup.com>
Cc: "CCIE LAB" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Unexpected exception
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/prod_release_note09186
> a00801677be.html
>
>
> CSCea64751
>
> Symptoms: A Cisco 2600 series may unexpectedly reload, or report
> "badshare"
> tracebacks, or do both. When the router reloads, the router generates
> messages similar to the following:
>
> Unexpected exception to CPUvector 1200, PC = 818C8B80
>
> -Traceback= 818C8B80 818C9454 818C9848 818CD814 818CA814 818C7A28 818BC7B4
> 801E64B8 801E5D30 801D9A44 804F8CBC 8047FD74 804EB824 804EB824 8047FE34
> 804EBCC0
>
> When "badshare" tracebacks occur, the router generates messages similar to
> the following:
>
> %SYS-2-BADSHARE: Bad refcount in pak_enqueue, ptr=8316E0F8, count=0
>
> -Traceback= 80406718 80407C38 818CC900 8026A9A0 80271EC4 8002258C 804FB374
> 804F8C84 8047FD74 804EB824 804EB824 8047FE34 80651388
>
> %SYS-2-BADSHARE: Bad refcount in datagram_done, ptr=8316E0F8, count=0
>
> -Traceback= 80403848 80407E68 818CC900 8026A9A0 80271EC4 8002258C 804FB374
> 804F8C84 8047FD74 804EB824 804EB824 8047FE34 80651388
>
> %SYS-2-BADSHARE: Bad refcount in datagram_done, ptr=8316E0F8, count=0
>
> Conditions: These symptoms are observed when the following two conditions
> occur:
>
> The Cisco 2600 series is configured with an asymmetric digital subscriber
> line (ADSL) or symmetric high-bit rate digital subscriber line (SHDSL) WAN
> interface card (WIC) that is installed in an onboard slot such as slot 0/0
> or slot 0/1.
>
> The upstream traffic rate exceeds the line rate, and this traffic is
> routed
> through the ADSL or SHDSL WIC. (The line rate is the maximum speed allowed
> by the digital subscriber line access multiplexer [DSLAM]).
>
> Workaround: Do not use onboard slots.
>
> Alternate workaround: Ensure that the router traffic rate is below the
> line
> rate.
>
>
>
> On 3/25/06, Victor Cappuccio <cvictor@protokolgroup.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All, I have seen many routers with an Unexpected Exception, like
>> this one...
>>
>> Unexpected exception to CPUvector 200, PC = 8002BD70
>> -Traceback= 8002BD70 8002C35C 8033950C 8049976C 8049841C 804987A4
>> 804987D0 8073C658 803AC474
>> Free space check for flash:crashinfo_19930301-030756 failed (68/13152)
>>
>> Is there something I can do (before opening a SR on the TAC) to know
>> what is really happening??
>> Thanks
>> Victor.
>>
>> Rack1R5#show flash:
>>
>> System flash directory:
>> File Length Name/status
>> 1 15188900 c2600-j1s3-mz.122-15.T16.bin
>> 2 335016 crashinfo_19930302-083749 [deleted]
>> 3 305916 crashinfo_19930301-004752 [deleted]
>> 4 352060 crashinfo_19930302-021157 [deleted]
>> 5 57903 crashinfo_19930301-121819 [deleted]
>> 6 12679 crashinfo_19930301-083337 [deleted]
>> [16252860 bytes used, 68 available, 16252928 total]
>> 16384K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)
>>
>> Rack1R5#more flash:crashinfo_19930301-083337
>> %Error opening flash:crashinfo_19930301-083337 (No such file or directory
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:40 GMT-3