Re: Redistribute - more redundancy or more safe from loops

From: Jon Mitchell (jrmitche@puck.nether.net)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2006 - 11:18:58 GMT-3


Nick,

Do what the test says, nothing more, nothing less. If there is no
requirement for redundancy, do not overly complicate things.

-Jon
#15953

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:03:43PM +0200, Popgeorgiev Nikolay wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> >From my subject you may feel what my question will be but let me ask it clearly.
>
> If nothing in the task is said about redistribution except the fact that all addresses should be rechable from all devices, what should I do
>
> Should I filter as more as possible when redistributing to avoid loops ?
>
> or
>
> Should I make everything possible to enable maximum redundancy if one path fails other(s) to be available ?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
> Nick
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:39 GMT-3