From: Emil Patel (emilpatel@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2006 - 18:07:44 GMT-3
When it comes to dealing with frame relay I prefer static unless forced to
use dynamic mappings.
Thank you.
_____
From: Mushtaq A. Khan [mailto:mak.ccie2b@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:59 PM
To: Emil Patel
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ipv6 over FR:
It is correct that remote link local has to be mapped in Frame Relay in
order for the IGP to run on IPv6. You can either use the auto generated link
local address or create your own the same way you did. The only difference
is that it is easier to remember what you configured as compared to use the
router generated one.
HTH,
Mushtaq
On 3/12/06, Emil Patel <emilpatel@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ipv6 over Frame relay is pretty straight forward and similar to ipv4. The
added complexity comes in when you run a routing protocol over frame relay
running ipv6.
As I recall from the class is that we have to resolve not only remote ipv6
to dlci but also remote link local address to dlci. Is this correct
statement?
Also if you have to resolve remote link local to dlci can we predefine link
local addresses on the interfaces running FR?
Eg:
On R2
Int s0/0
Ipv6 enable
Ipv6 address 2001::1/64
Ipv6 address FE80::1 link local
So in the above case when:
On R5
Int s0/0
Encap frame
No frame inv
Ipv6 address 2001::5/64
Ipv6 address FE80::5 link local
Frame relay map ipv6 2001::1 501 br
Frame relay map ipv6 FE80::1 501 br
Is this correct way to do it? It seems to work so just want to confirm..
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3