From: Jens Petter Eikeland (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Sun Mar 12 2006 - 09:24:13 GMT-3
hi you could try to use a static route with next hop beeing the hub. This
should make your destination recurce to the next hop (hub) router for the
destination. I am not sure this will work here since the recursion maybe
allready done and if so the static would never go in effect..
Jens
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pranab Bhowmick" <pbhowmick@gmail.com>
To: "Kemal Yildirim (Netron)" <Kemal.Yildirim@netron.com.tr>
Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Policy based routing in partially-meshed FR/OSPF network
> Hi Kemal,
> Thanks for your response. I should have specified that one of the
> requirements is to use only 1 frame-relay map command under the serial
> interface on R1/R3. I know its kind of stupid, but thats how it is. I
> guess
> I'm looking for a L3 solution to this.
> thanks,
> Pranab
>
> On 3/12/06, Kemal Yildirim (Netron) <Kemal.Yildirim@netron.com.tr> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pranab,
>> I guess you missed to provide proper L3/L2 mapping on frame-relay links,
>> and this is not a OSPF issue in reality.
>> At spokes you need at least one L3/L2 mapping for HUB, and if you want
>> reachability between spokes, you also need extra mappings for spoke to
>> spoke traffic. For spoke-to-spoke mapping you don't need broadcast, I
>> hope this help you.
>> Regards,
>> Kemal
>>
>> R1:
>> interface Serial0/0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip address 123.1.123.1 255.255.255.0
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.2 102 broadcast ----> for HUB (R2)
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.3 102 ----> for R3
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>
>> R2:
>> interface Serial0/0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip address 123.1.123.2 255.255.255.0
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.1 201 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.3 203 broadcast
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>
>> R3:
>> interface Serial0/0
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip address 123.1.123.3 255.255.255.0
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.2 302 broadcast ----> for HUB (R2)
>> frame-relay map ip 123.1.123.1 302 ----> for R1
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Pranab Bhowmick
>> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 10:53 AM
>> To: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Policy based routing in partially-meshed FR/OSPF network
>>
>> I have the following hub and spoke FR network:
>>
>> R2
>> (multi-point)
>> / \
>> dlci 102/201 / \ dlci 302/203
>> / \
>> R1 R3
>>
>> With ospf network type configured as non-broadcast and manually
>> configuring
>> R2 as DR and R1/R3 as neighbors, I am able to bring the OSPF adjacencies
>> up.
>> I'm using a /24 subnet so R3 shows up as directly connected to R1. Now
>> when
>> I try to ping R3 from R1, it fails because there is no direct
>> connectivity
>> between R1 and R3. Other than policy-based routing (making R2 as
>> next-hop),
>> is there an another way of make R1 and R3 reachable to each other?
>>
>> Appreciate your help.
>> Pranab
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3