From: xprtofnet (xprtofnet@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2006 - 17:26:35 GMT-3
Folks,
any inputs are appreciated.
I have tested both cmds [server/peer] and in both
cases ntp fails over to the other time source.
You may have to copy and paste the following output to
a notepad to see it properly. I was expecting that ntp
will not fail over if i use the following config
[server/server]. But it did in ~510 secs. as it does
with the peer cmd [server/peer]
what is the difference between the two cmds ? i know
documentation say about using the peer cmd when
configuring a symetric time source but why use it peer
cmd when i can use the same result with server cmd ?
I tested clients (configured with server cmd) giving
time to other clients and peers to peers. I do not see
the difference here...as per my test.
requesting inputs.
ntp server 130.1.1.1 prefer
ntp server 130.1.3.3
address ref clock st when poll
reach delay offset disp
*~130.1.1.1 .LOCL. 1 510 64
200 40.0 -0.14 16000.
+~130.1.3.3 .LOCL. 1 40 64
377 40.0 416102 4.0
* master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, -
candidate, ~ configured
R2(config)#do sho nt as
address ref clock st when poll
reach delay offset disp
*~130.1.1.1 .LOCL. 1 511 64
200 40.0 -0.14 16000.
+~130.1.3.3 .LOCL. 1 41 64
377 40.0 416102 4.0
* master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, -
candidate, ~ configured
R2(config)#do sho nt as
address ref clock st when poll
reach delay offset disp
~130.1.1.1 .LOCL. 1 512 64
0 40.0 -0.14 16000.
*~130.1.3.3 .LOCL. 1 42 64
377 40.0 416102 4.0
* master (synced), # master (unsynced), + selected, -
candidate, ~ configured
R2(config)#do sho nt as de
130.1.1.1 configured, insane, invalid, stratum 1
ref ID .LOCL., time AEEF21BE.ED424A80 (15:02:06.926
EST Fri Jan 1 1993)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64,
peer poll intvl 64
root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.03, reach 0, sync
dist 6351134.750
delay 39.99 msec, offset -0.1405 msec, dispersion
16000.00
precision 2**18, version 3
org time 00000000.00000000 (19:00:00.000 EST Thu Dec
31 1899)
rcv time 00000000.00000000 (19:00:00.000 EST Thu Dec
31 1899)
xmt time C7BC5E1B.27DBAB24 (15:20:43.155 EST Fri Mar
10 2006)
filtdelay = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
filtoffset = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
filterror = 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0 16000.0
16000.0 16000.0 16000.0
130.1.3.3 configured, our_master, sane, valid, stratum
1
ref ID .LOCL., time C7BC5E1F.1572E918 (15:20:47.083
EST Fri Mar 10 2006)
our mode client, peer mode server, our poll intvl 64,
peer poll intvl 64
root delay 0.00 msec, root disp 0.03, reach 7, sync
dist 3898.010
delay 39.99 msec, offset 0.0891 msec, dispersion
3877.99
precision 2**18, version 3
org time C7BC5E31.301292A0 (15:21:05.187 EST Fri Mar
10 2006)
rcv time C7BC5E31.3424C227 (15:21:05.203 EST Fri Mar
10 2006)
xmt time C7BC5E31.27DAFF86 (15:21:05.155 EST Fri Mar
10 2006)
filtdelay = 47.99 39.99 39.99 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
filtoffset = 8.10 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
filterror = 0.02 0.99 1.97 16000.0 16000.0
16000.0 16000.0 16000.0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3