From: Nick Griffin (ngriffin@sio.midco.net)
Date: Fri Mar 10 2006 - 01:39:59 GMT-3
Is this expected behavior, I've seen this a couple times on some
different scenarios. My OSPF VL interface says that hellos are
suppressed after I add the initial configurations for the VL. I can go
ahead and remove the OSPF process/configuration and readd, and then
hellos are sent. I've only noticed this on 12.2(15)T16. Is this common,
or just an issue with this particular version? The result is until I i
remove and readd the process, I just get to the INIT change on the
opposite neighbor, since the hellos are not sent:
version 12.2(15)T16
virtual link stays passive, until ospf process is removed, and then readded
Rack1R1#sh ip ospf int
OSPF_VL0 is up, line protocol is up
Internet Address 0.0.0.0/0, Area 0
Process ID 1, Router ID 150.1.1.1, Network Type VIRTUAL_LINK, Cost: 845
Configured as demand circuit.
Run as demand circuit.
DoNotAge LSA allowed.
Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
oob-resync timeout 40
No Hellos (Passive interface)
Index 1/3, flood queue length 0
Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
Last flood scan length is 0, maximum is 0
Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 0
Suppress hello for 1 neighbor(s)
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
area 1 virtual-link 150.1.5.5
redistribute connected subnets route-map CONNECTED->OSPF
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Serial0/0
no passive-interface Serial0/1
network 163.2.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 2
network 163.2.13.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
neighbor 163.2.13.3
neighbor 163.2.12.2
Thanks,
Nick Griffin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3