why CCIE Security?

From: blodwick (blodwick@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 21:15:45 GMT-3

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Previous message: blodwick: "RE: Dampening on the interface"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: blodwick: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Jens Petter Eikeland: "Re: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Diment, Andrew: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I am curious about the primary motive people have for pursuing the
Security CCIE?

The reason I question it is because when it comes to routing and
switching products its a no-brainer Cisco is the leader by a long shot,
but there is a major difference in Ciscos market-share when it comes to
security related products.

I suspect the reason is because folks want to show expert competency in
security and know that employers already have a developed respect for
the CCIE title in general.

Just curious
Brian L.

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.1.2/274 - Release Date: 3/3/2006

Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Previous message: blodwick: "RE: Dampening on the interface"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: blodwick: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Jens Petter Eikeland: "Re: why CCIE Security?"
Maybe reply: Diment, Andrew: "RE: why CCIE Security?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:38 GMT-3