Re: Frame-relay Traffic Shapping Question

From: Ahmed Shams (ahmedshamz@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2006 - 13:10:33 GMT-3


So in this case if you aint sure about the default Tc value for higher speed
links (as Chris mentioned), the better approach would be to enable
traffic-shaping on those and check what "show traffic-shape" output
returns.. Just the matter of doing some math and your are there..

Does that make sense chris?

Shams

On 3/1/06, Chris Lewis <chrlewiscsco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please note Tc only defaults to 125msec for certain line speeds, the
> faster
> the line speed, the lower the default Tc, so I would recommend against
> assuming 125 msec as the default.
>
>
> On 2/28/06, PANDI MOORTHY <moorthypandi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Group
> >
> > Question on the Frame-relay traffic shaping.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 1) The question is ask to configure provisioned rate on the FR
> interface,
> > but doesn't specify the TC, value, so in this case what would be the Tc
> > value should I need to choose. (is it the minimum value 10)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) I have the configuration as below.
> >
> >
> >
> > !
> >
> > map-class frame-relay DLCI_403
> >
> > frame-relay cir 1024000
> >
> > frame-relay bc 10240
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have CIR 1024k and the BC value as well, I haven't specify the minicir
> > value in this configuration. What would be the minicir value when there
> is
> > congestion in the network? (Is it the default value 56k?)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please give me your input on this, thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> > Pandi
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 01 2006 - 10:07:37 GMT-3