From: Jens Petter Eikeland (jenseike@start.no)
Date: Wed Feb 22 2006 - 08:10:44 GMT-3
Can anybody try give me some good arguments for running bgp over ospf
internaly compared to running bgp over static routes.. We are going soon to
design redundancy in to our net and I am trying to tell that this would work
best with running dynamic routing in under BGP. There is a guy that are
trying to convince me that running only BGP would be better (with static
routes). We have this today. I am trying to say that this is not a good
solution. We have over 200 static routes on our core router, and it is not
very easy to keep track of anything... Anyway, when we are going over to
both have internal redundancy (internally)and external redundancy to our ISP
how could this possible be scalable with static routing. We are an ISP, and
have got many tousen customers that we are going to get in to to net soon.
This will generate more static routes... My suggestion is that we run OSPF
internally with BGP on every router in out core net, but he is saying that
keeping static routes and BGP is still the best solution..
Looking for some good arguments
Jens
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3