RE: ADV to null0

From: Ice Fire (fire_ice@verizon.net)
Date: Tue Feb 21 2006 - 12:53:37 GMT-3

• Next message: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com: "Difference on Police Command"
• Previous message: Hiro Eiji: "Re: Are native vlan packets really untagged?"
• Maybe in reply to: tony hall: "ADV to null0"
• Next in thread: xprtofnet: "RE: ADV to null0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I don't believe that RIP will send a default route if there isn't a default
route in the routing table. This is the reason for the null0 route, create a
default route to Null0 the redistribute that, then longer prefix takes over
once the packet hits the router.

Thanks

Ice Fire
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of tony
hall
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:24 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: ADV to null0

Hi,
Please if someone can explain the config below.

router rip
redistribute ospf 1 metric 5 route-map NOADV
route-map NOADV deny 10
match int null0
route-map NOADV permit 20

The requirment is to only send one route to RIP domain from OSPF , which
contains sevral routes from other Protocols.
Is not the best way to orignate default route instead?

• Next message: Bill.McKenzie@bisys.com: "Difference on Police Command"
• Previous message: Hiro Eiji: "Re: Are native vlan packets really untagged?"
• Maybe in reply to: tony hall: "ADV to null0"
• Next in thread: xprtofnet: "RE: ADV to null0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:18 GMT-3