From: easyman.lin (easyman.lin@msa.hinet.net)
Date: Tue Feb 07 2006 - 08:20:41 GMT-3
Hi, Theerapol
Ok, let's say you have two routers R1 & R2
R1(e0) --------------(e0)R2
And you want unicast the rip update to R2 but you are prohibited to use the
neighbor command.
So, on R1 You can use NAT as following
R1
Interface e0
Ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
Ip nat outside
Ip nat outside source static udp 1.1.1.2 520 224.0.0.9 520 (R2's ip addres
is 1.1.1.2)
HTH.
Regards,
Lin
-----Original Message-----
From: Theerapol Boonnan [mailto:theerab@net1.co.th]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 6:58 PM
To: easyman.lin
Subject: RE: Unicast neighbor for RIP
Hi Lin
Do you have sample configuration for this case? To do NAT to
translate from 224.0.0.9 to unicast address.
Best Regards
Theerapol
-----Original Message-----
From: easyman.lin [mailto:easyman.lin@msa.hinet.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:49 PM
To: Theerapol Boonnan; GroupStudy CCIE-Lab
Subject: RE: Unicast neighbor for RIP
I'm a little bit confused of your question.
AFAIK there is no neighbor relationship between to RIP speaking routers.
They only send and receive updates but not forming neighbor
relationship.
I suppose you are asking of sending update to multicast address
224.0.0.9
but received as an unicast from neighbors.
If that's true then you need to use nat function to achieve this.
HTH.
Regards,
Lin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Theerapol Boonnan
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:31 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Unicast neighbor for RIP
Hi
I have a question about RIP, by default RIP will use
multicast 224.0.0.9 to form neighbor. If I just want to form unicast
neighborship between R1 & R2 but don't use "neighbor" statement. How can
I do this?
Theerapol
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3