From: Sean C. (Upp_and_Upp@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Feb 05 2006 - 11:19:06 GMT-3
Hi Nadeem,
Good catch. I've been searching on CCO and Google for an answer, and can't
find a reason for the BW of 0 either.
Now I'm curious!
Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nadeem Zahid (iszahid)" <iszahid@cisco.com>
To: "Nadeem Zahid (iszahid)" <iszahid@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:33 PM
Subject: RE: Issue with EIGRP routes
Well - very strange. I figured:
R6#sh int virtual-access 2
Virtual-Access2 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Virtual Access interface
Internet address is 192.1.10.6/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 0 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
BB1#sh int virtual-access 3
Virtual-Access3 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Virtual Access interface
Internet address is 192.1.10.254/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Obviously there is a K mismatch as BW=0 on the serial side - donno why?
I fixed it and it works now:
interface Virtual-Template1
bandwidth 100000
R6#sh int virtual-access 2
Virtual-Access2 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Virtual Access interface
Internet address is 192.1.10.6/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Nadeem
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nadeem Zahid (iszahid)
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 10:21 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Issue with EIGRP routes
I see that when I'm running EIGRP on top of PPPoFR between two
routers...I don't get the advertised EIGRP routes on the other side.
Removing the VT/PPP from the subint and running it over FR directly,
everything works.
Any known issues? One side is Hssi, other side is Serial but I don't
think that is the problem.
thnx
Nadeem
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 01 2006 - 11:28:17 GMT-3