From: CCIEin2006 (ciscocciein2006@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 29 2006 - 12:22:35 GMT-3
So basically if I receive a RIP route such as 10.1.1.0 from a BB router and
there is nothing on the lab saying you must be able to ping a host on this
network, I should not even bother, correct?
On 1/28/06, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> That's a pretty vague concept... Basically, you're supposed to do
> whatever
> the lab tells you to do!
>
> Some may tell you to reach all the ethernets, others perhaps a loopback
> only. I don't think there'd be any pat answer.
>
> As for the TCL script, if it makes sense based on your lab requirements to
> do that, then the answer is sure. But IMHO there isn't any "standard"
> answer to that question. Read your lab! It'll mention what is reachable
> and what isn't. Some routes you may send out, others you may not. Each
> lab
> may be different
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> CCIEin2006
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 8:05 PM
> To: ccie lab
> Subject: Should you be able to ping backbone routers on the LAB?
>
> Hello once again list,
>
> Can someone tell me if you're supposed be able to all the interfaces on
> the
> backbone routers?
> If that is the case then how are you supposed to know all the IP addresses
> on the routers when you have no access to them?
> For example, do you assume that any route received from the BB routers you
> should be able to ping the .1 address?
>
> And finally, as a best practice should you include in your TCL script the
> aforementioned IP addresses?
>
> Thanks again.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3