From: Krishnaji Panse (ashmanpan@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 23 2006 - 09:39:18 GMT-3
Hi,
I have seen all these mails about sso on 6500 and fail over time , what
about GSR ?
We are running so many GSR in our network and when doing FSU we found that
after forcible switch over all LC are going from IOS run mode and did resets
itself and again came up with IOS run mode, is this a normal procedure ?
Then it took around 10 minutes. If yes then what is the solution to reduce
this IOS upgrade down time
Thanks in advance.
----KP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ronald Fugate
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 1:32 AM
To: Jeremy O'Dette; messageboard@ventrefamily.com
Cc: jslauer@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: sso issues
Thanks Jeremy,
There seems to be some consistent answers with the sxd code embedded
here.
I have sent an email off to my AS rep just now asking about this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy O'Dette [mailto:jeremyodette@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:59 PM
To: Ronald Fugate; messageboard@ventrefamily.com
Cc: jslauer@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: sso issues
We recently deployed a pair of 6513s sup720/12.2(18)SXD6/native mode and
the
sso on those is rock solid. I know because I tested the hell out of
them
since these were going in our core. Failover was consistently 2-3
seconds.
Jeremy O'Dette
CCIE #14973
jeremyodette@hotmail.com
>From: "Ronald Fugate" <RFugate@amdocs.com>
>Reply-To: "Ronald Fugate" <RFugate@amdocs.com>
>To: "James Ventre" <messageboard@ventrefamily.com>
>CC: "joshua lauer" <jslauer@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: sso issues
>Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:54:23 -0600
>
>That's good information to know.
>Thanks James; I will ask our AS rep about the sxf vs. sxd.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James Ventre [mailto:messageboard@ventrefamily.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:51 PM
>To: Ronald Fugate
>Cc: joshua lauer; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: sso issues
>
>I've seen no major issues with SSO on SXF. But I've heard from a
number
>
>of folks that the SXD train is far more stable. It was even
recommended
>
>to a customer of mine during a cisco audit. IIRC they were on SXE.
>
>James
>
>
>
>Ronald Fugate wrote:
> > About 30 seconds delay on native.
> >
> > Cisco believes there is a hardware issue buried in here somewhere.
> >
> > I have 11 6500's (06's, 09's and 13's) I have to deploy this on next
> > month
> > And was hoping that they were right so I could just verify the
>hardware.
> >
> > Just wanted to verify here if anyone has seen any issues to this.
> >
> > Can't afford to take any chances in production.
> >
> > Thanks for your quick response.
> >
>
>
>The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,
>protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.
>The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated
>recipient(s)
>of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>recipient,
>you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or
>copying of
>this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
>immediately
>by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
>Thank you.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,
protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.
The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated
recipient(s)
of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying
of
this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3