From: Nambi Appachigounder (nambi_gct@yahoo.co.in)
Date: Sun Jan 22 2006 - 04:56:06 GMT-3
Yes.Lets say the address assignment is as follows.
R4 => 10.0.0.1/8
R5 => 10.0.0.2/8
End host => 10.0.0.3/8
We need to configure VRRP on R4 and R5 with the
statement "vrrp 10 ip 10.0.0.1".In the end host you
need to give the gateway address as "10.0.0.1".Even if
R4 fails R5 will respond to packets sent to 10.0.0.1
I think we don't need to bother abt IRDP when we go
for HSRP/VRRP.
To overcome the inefficiencies with Proxy ARP and IRDP
we chose HSRP/vrrp.Please correct me otherwise.
Regards,
Nambi.
--- Nick <seajay76@nate.com> wrote:
> Wow, I didn't know that.
>
> Then, if requirements are like following, the
> solution would be to configure VRRP!!
>
> Requirement
> (1) Configure gateway redundancy so that clients in
> VLAN X can use R4 as a primary default gateway,
> and R5 in case of failure of R4.
>
> (2) The clients don't support IRDP.
>
> Am I right??
>
> Regards,
> Nick
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nambi Appachigounder" <nambi_gct@yahoo.co.in>
> To: "Scott Morris" <swm@emanon.com>;
> <RIDNEY_M_LAUDIANO.TTSP@ts.tsuneishi.co.jp>;
> "'Jtheunissen'" <jtheunissen@dodo.com.au>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:49 PM
> Subject: RE: VRRP vs Standby
>
>
> > Also in VRRP, VIP can be the same as interface IP
> but
> > in hsrp it is not possible.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nambi
> > --- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Vrrp preempt IS indeed enabled by default, but
> you
> >> can change the delay if
> >> you want.
> >> Tracking was introduced in 12.3(2)T, so if you
> are
> >> on a 12.4 router, you
> >> will have that functionality.
> >>
> >> Otherwise, it's pretty similar. (No
> authentication
> >> by default, unlike HSRP)
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> >> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> RIDNEY_M_LAUDIANO.TTSP@ts.tsuneishi.co.jp
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 9:16 PM
> >> To: Jtheunissen; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: Re: VRRP vs Standby
> >>
> >> and a quick guess:
> >>
> >> vrrp routers are configured to preempt by default
> >> and most importantly it
> >> has no mechanism to track interfaces
> >>
> >>
> >> "Jtheunissen" <jtheunissen@dodo.com.au> wrote on
> >> 01/20/2006 09:52:27 AM:
> >>
> >> ) Just a quick question what is the leading
> >> difference between VRRP and
> >> ) Standby options for fault tolerence ?.
> >>
> >> ) Jeff
> >>
> >> )
> ________________________________________________
> >>
> >> ) Message sent using Dodo Internet Webmail Server
> >>
> >> )
> >>
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 07:45:50 GMT-3